01. Time Desynchronized
Modernization of Time in Western Culture
The introduction of mechanical clocks on public buildings such as the church indicated the beginning
of the definition of “the rhythm of everyday life”.
[Fig.1]
One of the very first clocks as we know them, the turret clock,was invented and used from the late
13th century and quickly spread over central Europe.
[Fig.2]
Subsequently, this clock began to change our perception of time. Whereas before we were led by the
positioning of the sun, facilitated by the analog use of sundials, we now had a mathematically
numbered and mechanical tool that was not reliant on the weather.
[Fig.3]
Night or day, the clock would tell us what time it is. As the clock hands moved across seconds,
minutes, striking another hour, time became a
mechanical force, a set of gears put in motion. Another development, which led to the eventual
process of desynchronization, was the increase of artificial light which began from the fifteenth century. Candles, fire, and oil
lamps were exchanged for electric lighting which
disconnected people from the earth’s day/night cycle. Hand in hand with the turret clock, our
perception of time was no longer reliant on nature.
The natural rhythm and social construct of time became more separated, leading to physical effects
on our bodies.
In order to structure days and to regulate punctuality across different
time zones, the standardization of world time was introduced in 1884. A
strict punctuality in society ensured that trains could move forth smoothly
one after another, accelerating the transport of both goods and people, of
wealth and of knowledge. As all these tools became essential to keep up the
newly accelerated pace of life, productivity and time began to deeply
entangle themselves into our society. Today, when a logistics network
becomes disrupted for as little as an hour, it is entirely possible to feel
its repercussions in every facet of our life, for weeks to come.
The necessity of timekeeping progressed the concept of time as a
commodity. The age-old adage "Time is Money”, which originates from the book
Advice to A Young Tradesman (1748) by Benjamin Franklin, is still applicable
today.
Franklin justifies how both success and failure are dependent on the
management of time. If time is not managed correctly, then the opportunity
to become prosperous is lost forever because time itself cannot be rewound.
And so on, there are many expressions in which time could be “saved, spent,
wasted, or lost”, all of them indicating to the concept of “time equals
money” to “time equals loss”. This is introduced to us from the very first
days of our education, all the way into our work environment.
Time being perceived as something external, could be linked to seasons,
or cycles of the sun. It is something that stands on its own, aside from
other occurrences that are happening at the same moment. Our internal time
is defined by memories, demands and the things we do; the interaction
between you and your personal surroundings, the knowledge, and experiences
that you have acquired throughout the years are the definition of subjective
time. Jumping from the far past to recent memories, to remembering what we
did, thought or felt yesterday, is the non-measurable way of defining time.
It can hold on to all directions, variations of speed and shapes; also
termed Chronesthesia – a hypothetical mind ability that allows humans to be
constantly aware of the past and the future. The Estonian Canadian
psychologist Endel Tulving introduced this theory, which appeared together
with the term 'episodic memory’. Tulving states that the ability for ‘mental
time travel’ is to create awareness for the present, past and future.
Therefore, to adjust our attitude to the occurrences that have not happened
yet. Time does not decide on the duration of each task or activity or when
to move forward to the next moment. Instead, it is decided by the impression
whether you have done enough. You move forward to the next task if it
appears natural to continue. It serves as a reminder that we not only live
through time, but time also lives through us.
The Acceleration of Modernity
In the interview with German Sociologist Hartmut Rosa for the book “The
Future of The New”, Rosa criticizes if acceleration is the fundamental
characteristic of modernity.
He breaks it into three aspects: technical acceleration, social change and the
accelerated pace of life. During the 1800s – also termed “early modernity” – social change
was “intergenerational”, meaning social structures would differ over several
generations. It was something that could not possibly be imagined during the
lifespan of a single generation. Before the onset of modernity, if a son was
born in the family, he would inherit the profession of the father. If a
daughter was born in the family, she would inherit the mother’s livelihood.
That means at the time, it was impossible for her to imagine she could have
a career. The son, following the lead of his father, would then again pass
on his career to the next generation. In classical modernity – between 1800
to 1970 – the social change was generational in terms of deciding for each
their own profession, which would then be maintained for the rest of their
life. Nowadays, in late modernity, we are experiencing the
“intragenerational”; instead of pursuing a single career, it occurs
frequently that people are switching jobs and even re-educating themselves
into different professions all over the course of a single lifespan and
regardless of age or gender. For a profession to last a lifespan has become
an exception rather than the norm and “flexible jobs” – thus flexible
contracts and undefined time – are dominating the market.
According to Rosa, we have ended up in a paradoxical state in where
everything is constantly moving and yet nothing really ever changes. The
pace of the technological, economic, and social change is nowadays so fast,
that we are unable to control and manage it. This stands in conflict with
the aspects of the slower processes which move according to autonomous
values, such as deciding on how and when work should be done. This makes it
increasingly difficult to manage or plan our individual lives in a
meaningful way – meaningful as referring to the modest pace of change during
classical modernity, which allowed us to anticipate a meaningful life
through working hard and investing in education.
Today, we are entangled into waves of change that put us into
directionless and uncertain situations. We reach out into all the chances
that cross our path for the sake of experiencing something new while it does
not lead us towards a “single” goal. The concept of alienation gained
importance on how we endure the dissatisfaction with the problems of late-
modern, post-capitalist society. The understanding of alienation becomes
apparent in conditions and situations of where we feel we are not living
according to our ideals, even though we are “free” to choose how to live for
ourselves and not forced into decisions by external forces. We feel
compelled to keep up with a pace of modern life that the majority finds
“intoxicating” and ill for (mental) health, even though we choose to live
this way collectively.
“The powers of acceleration no longer are experienced as liberating force,
but as an actually enslaving pressure instead.”
Hartmut Rosa
Resonance is being conceived as the opposite of alienation. One becomes
alienated from the world and from oneself.
Yesterday's knowledge is outdated today, the day is barely experienced in
short-short time and work- and personal relationships become increasingly volatile.
Consequently, this can be seen as the flip side of the increased efficiency.
It culminates in more and more of the same mind-numbing and monotonous cycles that dominate our
day-to-day, extinguishing the chance of any meaningful and undetermined
interaction. The proposed solution of Rosa is to always seek for something
one can resonate with; a connection through a conversation in relation to an
occurrence, which could be a person but also a specific object. This acts as
a methodology that itself breaks free from repetition; the repetition that
comes with the “short-short” pattern and which is native to the process of
acceleration.